Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42331582›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Narrative exposure therapy in early intervention in psychosis services (NETp): protocol of a multi-site feasibility randomised controlled trial study .

Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, James Plaistow, Amy Hardy, Peter Martin, Natasha Lyons, Zarina Khan, Adeliede Mberi, Tiyi Morris, Sonia Johnson

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miriam Fornells-AmbrojoResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK miriam.fornells-ambrojo@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-5675
James PlaistowCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn, UK.
Amy HardyDepartment of Psychology, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6044-6093
Peter MartinInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-0638
Natasha LyonsDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Zarina KhanPublic representative, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Rainham, UK.
Adeliede MberiPatient/Public Representative, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn, UK.
Tiyi MorrisResearch Department of Clinical, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6018-1833
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2219-1384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCumulative interpersonal traumatisation increases the risk of psychosis and is linked to psychotic symptom severity and reduced recovery rates. Psychosis and treatment themselves can also be traumatising, with a first episode of psychosis posing challenges to one's identity. Despite a growing evidence base for the safety and effectiveness of trauma therapies for psychosis, implementation remains poor in early intervention for psychosis (EIP) services, partly due to resource constraints. Narrative exposure therapy (NET) is an effective intervention for post-traumatic stress disorder in ethnically diverse populations. Crucially it has potential to address barriers to implementation of trauma therapies in EIP as it has a brief duration with minimal training requirements. This feasibility study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a definite trial of NET in people with early psychosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An individually randomised parallel groups feasibility randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative evaluation will be conducted. 50 individuals with first episode psychosis and a history of multiple trauma under the care of an EIP service in two NHS trusts in England will be recruited. Participants will be randomised to receive either 15 sessions of NET in addition to treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Assessor blinded assessments will be conducted at baseline, 4 months (post-intervention) and 8 months (follow-up). Analyses will focus on feasibility outcomes (recruitment, retention and completion rates) and preliminary estimates of intervention effects to inform planning for a fully powered trial. Qualitative interviews will be carried out with participants allocated to NET and clinicians to investigate acceptability, barriers and facilitators, possible mechanisms of change, potential benefits or harms and recommendations. A sub-study in the NET group will investigate acceptability of completing Experience Sampling Data daily during therapy to monitor changes on candidate primary and secondary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received REC/HRA ethical approval from the London - City & East Research Ethics Committee (REC) (25/LO/0350). The results of the study will be reported and disseminated at international conferences and in open-access peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN39471182.

Indexed as

Early Medical InterventionImplosive TherapyNarrative TherapyPsychotic DisordersStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdultEnglandFeasibility StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignClinical TrialPsychosocial InterventionRandomized Controlled TrialSchizophrenia & psychotic disordersStress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute

Identifiers

PMID42331582
PMCPMC13288681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.