Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42331574›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2026

Implementing women's sexual and reproductive health interventions in prisons: a realist review.

Joy Rickard, G J Melendez-Torres

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joy RickardUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK jr884@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1836-8782
G J Melendez-TorresUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore what works for whom, how and why when implementing women's sexual and reproductive health interventions in prisons to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementation and to generate recommendations for policymakers.

designRealist review using the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards guidelines. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Global Health, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and the American Psychological Association (APA) PsycINFO databases and hand-searched unpublished literature and reference lists, January-June 2025. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Primary studies of implementing women's sexual and/or reproductive health interventions, including those addressing sexually transmitted infections, cervical health, breast screening, contraception and women's health holistically. Study populations included people in prisons that detain women in high-income countries. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted and analysed data relating to implementation processes using a grounded theory approach and retroductive inference to articulate cross-case Intervention-Context-Actor-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (ICAMOCs) and refine programme theory. We discussed findings in relation to existing theories from the literature to elicit recommendations for policymakers.

resultsOf 4617 deduplicated records, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Ten ICAMOCs were constructed from cross-case analyses, grouped into three themes: (1) planning (teaming, team leadership, assessing needs and capacity, tailoring and planning), (2) doing (piloting, standardisation and support, trauma-informed engagement and peer advocacy) and (3) sustaining (evaluation-adaptation cycles). The ICAMOCs indicated three overarching mechanisms as being key to effective implementation, namely, perceived utility of the intervention, motivation and empowerment.

conclusionsFor women's sexual and reproductive health interventions to be effective in prisons, everyone involved in implementation needs to perceive the intervention's benefit and be both motivated and empowered to take action. We recommend policymakers build a resilient and empowered delivery workforce, invest in research partnerships to increase awareness and understanding and promote trauma-informed approaches to women's healthcare in prisons.

Indexed as

PrisonsReproductive HealthReproductive Health ServicesSexual HealthWomen's HealthFemaleHealth Services for PrisonersHumansImplementation ScienceMass ScreeningPreventive Health ServicesPrisonsPUBLIC HEALTHSexually Transmitted Disease

Identifiers

PMID42331574
PMCPMC13288683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.