ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2026
The path to securing a resource-intensive physician job in Canada: lived experiences of decision-makers and trainees.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecuring meaningful employment as a physician is anxiety provoking, particularly in resource-intensive specialties, and newly certified specialists continue to report difficulty obtaining employment despite proposed solutions. In this study, we aimed to explore the lived experiences of decision-makers and trainees navigating job-seeking and placement in resource-intensive specialties in Canada and identify suggestions for improvement.
methodsIn this qualitative interview study, guided by phenomenology, we recruited trainees, recent graduates, program directors, and division chiefs from resource-intensive specialties across Canada, using purposive sampling. Participants completed semi-structured interviews, which we transcribed and inductively coded in duplicate using NVivo 12. We iteratively discussed the preliminary codes and grouped them into categories to identify overarching themes.
resultsWe interviewed 20 physicians across 15 specialties. Most described the hiring process as nebulous and difficult to navigate, citing challenges related to transparency, equity, and access. We identified 4 key themes: the hiring process is difficult to navigate and poorly defined, hiring decisions rely heavily on perceived fit, bias and inequity persist, and perspectives differ across participant groups. Participants suggested multilevel changes, such as creating national hiring guidelines to promote transparency and implementing structured career-planning initiatives for trainees.
interpretationOur study highlights factors that affect the hiring process for resource-intensive specialties in Canada and demonstrates misaligned expectations among participants that may create additional employment challenges. Changes at the individual, institutional, and national levels should be considered to promote transparency and reconcile divergent perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.