ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2026
A socioecological framework for physician advocacy: motivators, enablers, and barriers.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Chronic Stress and Trauma on Asthma Pathophysiology and Outcomes.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvocacy is a professional competency for Canadian physicians, yet adoption into medical education, academic medicine, and physician practice varies. We sought to explore perspectives on why and how physicians integrate health advocacy into their professional identity and to develop a model framework.
methodsWe used a phenomenological approach to develop a socioecological framework. Using purposeful and chain sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with physician advocates of diverse backgrounds, clinical specialties, and advocacy interests from across Canada. We used thematic analysis to identify themes, which we then mapped onto the socioecological model.
resultsWe interviewed 27 participants. We derived 7 themes: intrinsic motivation, role synergy, peers and institutions, external incentives, positionality, advocacy training, and strategic mindset. Themes layered onto or between 4 levels of the socioecological model. Within the intrapersonal level, identity, lived experiences, and exposures to injustice shaped advocacy commitment. Within the interpersonal level, patient relationships and moral injury motivated action; professional responsibility informed advocacy tactics. Within the organizational level, institutional constraints, political considerations, limited academic recognition, and fear of polarization and backlash were barriers; peer and institutional support were enablers. Within the community and society level, physicians described a tension between insider versus outsider roles and efficacy and needing to balance rapid public engagement with long-term institutional influence. Participants emphasized hands-on learning, mentorship, and a hidden curriculum.
interpretationPhysician advocates are influenced by lived experiences and perceived injustice, empowered by training and mentorship, constrained by perceived political and institutional barriers, and fear backlash. Formal curricula and aligned institutional culture support physicians in their role as advocates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.