Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42330738›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2026

Machine Learning Prediction of Heart Failure Readmissions: Insights From a Multicenter Emergency Department Trial.

Vishal Goel, Liam Scanlon, Kristina Lambrakis, Allister Lim, Sriram Rao, Malanka Lankaputhra, Johan Verjans, Ehsan Khan, Dion Stub, Jonathon Fanning and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vishal GoelVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Liam ScanlonVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Kristina LambrakisVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Allister LimVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Sriram RaoVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Malanka LankaputhraSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Johan VerjansCentral Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia; Australian Institute for Machine Learning, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Ehsan KhanSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Dion StubSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathon FanningPrince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Department of Health, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Health Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew LinVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Derek ChewVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: Derek.Chew@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure (HF) readmissions remain common and costly, yet existing prediction models show limited clinical utility, particularly at the time of emergency department (ED) presentation.

objectivesThis study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to predict 12-month HF readmission among patients presenting to EDs with suspected cardiac conditions.

methodsThis was a subanalysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial (n = 14,131) across 12 South Australia EDs (enrolled April-December 2023), which included patients with symptoms warranting high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T testing who were subsequently followed up for 12 months for HF readmission. The data set was randomly split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Four ML algorithms were compared with logistic regression. Features with >25% missing data were excluded. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsOf 14,131 ED patients (mean age 61 years; 49% female), 808 (5.71%) were readmitted for HF at a median of 83 days (IQR: 27-178). In the test set, an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model (AUC: 0.861; 95% CI: 0.847-0.875) outperformed logistic regression for the prediction of HF readmission (AUC: 0.846; 95% CI: 0.828-0.861; P = 0.015). AUCs for other ML models were 0.845 (random forest), 0.851 (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator), and 0.842 (neural networks). The Brier score for XGB was 0.151, demonstrating good model calibration.

conclusionsAn XGB-based ML model accurately predicted 12-month HF readmission following ED presentation and outperformed traditional regression methods, supporting its potential role in early risk stratification and targeted preventive care.

Indexed as

heart failurehospitalizationmachine learningprediction models

Identifiers

PMID42330738
PMCPMC13315187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.