ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Machine Learning Prediction of Heart Failure Readmissions: Insights From a Multicenter Emergency Department Trial.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) readmissions remain common and costly, yet existing prediction models show limited clinical utility, particularly at the time of emergency department (ED) presentation.
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models to predict 12-month HF readmission among patients presenting to EDs with suspected cardiac conditions.
methodsThis was a subanalysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial (n = 14,131) across 12 South Australia EDs (enrolled April-December 2023), which included patients with symptoms warranting high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T testing who were subsequently followed up for 12 months for HF readmission. The data set was randomly split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Four ML algorithms were compared with logistic regression. Features with >25% missing data were excluded. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsOf 14,131 ED patients (mean age 61 years; 49% female), 808 (5.71%) were readmitted for HF at a median of 83 days (IQR: 27-178). In the test set, an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model (AUC: 0.861; 95% CI: 0.847-0.875) outperformed logistic regression for the prediction of HF readmission (AUC: 0.846; 95% CI: 0.828-0.861; P = 0.015). AUCs for other ML models were 0.845 (random forest), 0.851 (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator), and 0.842 (neural networks). The Brier score for XGB was 0.151, demonstrating good model calibration.
conclusionsAn XGB-based ML model accurately predicted 12-month HF readmission following ED presentation and outperformed traditional regression methods, supporting its potential role in early risk stratification and targeted preventive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.