ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2026
Testing a social mechanism of recovery high schools: Peer affiliation as a mediator of substance use outcomes.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLimited options for developmentally appropriate continuing care represent a critical barrier for youth in recovery. As one of the few options designed specifically for adolescents, recovery high schools (RHSs) warrant investigation to better understand their effects and the mechanisms through which they operate. This study examined the long-term effects of RHS attendance and tested whether peer-level social change operates as a mechanism.
methodsData were drawn from a longitudinal, group-design study of RHS effectiveness. Twelve-month follow-up substance use outcomes were compared between 146 adolescents who enrolled in RHSs after treatment and a propensity score-balanced comparison group of 117 adolescents who enrolled in traditional schools. Time-lagged mediation models tested whether recovery-positive peer affiliation at the 6-month follow-up mediated these effects.
resultsRelative to the comparison group at the 12-month follow-up, adolescents who attended an RHS were less likely to have alcohol use disorder (OR = 0.31) or a drug use disorder (OR = 0.42), reported fewer cannabis use days (IRR = 0.62), and had higher odds of abstinence (OR = 2.53) after adjusting for baseline levels. Recovery-positive peer affiliation mediated the beneficial effects of RHS attendance on meeting criteria for a drug use disorder, cannabis use frequency, and abstinence.
conclusionsThese findings provide robust evidence of the long-term beneficial effects of RHS attendance and indicate that some benefits result from improvements in recovery-positive peer affiliation. Improving access to youth-focused recovery supports that facilitate positive social network changes could help reduce relapse risk and sustain treatment effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.