ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Leveraging Large Language Models to Integrate Clinical Knowledge and Machine Learning Predictions for Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction: Development of a Knowledge-Augmented Framework.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a critical clinical indicator for determining the initial treatment strategy for patients with lung cancer. However, accurately diagnosing LNM preoperatively remains a significant challenge. Data-driven predictive modeling has become a mainstream approach to address this issue, yet it often overlooks existing clinical knowledge. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the potential to predict clinical risks in a zero-shot manner based on the extensive clinical knowledge learned from large-scale corpora. Objective: LLMs have demonstrated the potential to predict clinical risks in a zero-shot manner based on the extensive clinical knowledge learned from large-scale corpora. This study aims to investigate the integration of LLM-derived knowledge with data-driven patterns to enhance the accuracy of LNM prediction. Methods: We propose a novel ensemble framework that combines the strengths of LLMs and machine learning (ML) models for LNM prediction in lung cancer. Specifically, 3 ML models were trained using clinical data, and their predicted probabilities, along with the original clinical features, were incorporated into prompts for LLMs. Three LLMs-GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4-nano, and DeepSeek-V3.2-were used to independently predict LNM risk 5 times, and 4 ensemble strategies were applied to aggregate their predictions into a final outcome. Results: The proposed approach was evaluated on clinical data from 767 patients with lung cancer at Peking University Cancer Hospital. Experimental results show that our proposed framework significantly outperforms base ML models, achieving an area under the curve of 0.781 and an average precision of 0.420. Compared with the no reasoning English setting, both the reasoning English setting and nonreasoning Chinese setting showed a lower area under the curve but higher average precision. Conclusions: This study presents a novel knowledge-augmented strategy for integrating the clinical knowledge embedded in LLMs with the statistical patterns captured by ML models to improve the LNM prediction of lung cancer, offering a new paradigm for integrating medical knowledge and patient data in clinical predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.