Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42330363›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026

Exploring quality and patient safety competencies and competency frameworks: a scoping review.

Dimuthu Rathnayake, Sahar Hammoud, Veronica Hanlon, Louise Hendrick, Mary Browne, Gemma Moore, John Fitzsimons, Aoife De Brún

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dimuthu RathnayakeUCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3919-6824
Sahar HammoudUCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Veronica HanlonNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Health Service Executive (HSE), D08 W2A8, Ireland.
Louise HendrickNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Health Service Executive (HSE), D08 W2A8, Ireland.
Mary BrowneNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Health Service Executive (HSE), D08 W2A8, Ireland.
Gemma MooreNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Health Service Executive (HSE), D08 W2A8, Ireland.
John FitzsimonsNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate, Health Service Executive (HSE), D08 W2A8, Ireland.
Aoife De BrúnUCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-0893

Funding

National Quality and Patient Safety, Health Service Executive (HSE) Ireland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSustaining quality and patient safety (QPS) is a global priority due to risks such as patient harm, poor experiences, inequity, and resource waste. Training and education in key competency areas can support continuous improvement and enhance workforce performance. Clearly defining core QPS competencies for healthcare staff is essential to ensure preparedness to provide quality, safe care. Competency frameworks provide structured support for training and curriculum development, with many developed globally as strategic initiatives, some using evidence-based approaches. However, there is no consensus on core competencies to promote quality and patient safety, definitions of relevant terms can vary, and evidence on framework effectiveness is mixed. To address this research gap, the objective of this review was to systematically explore and collate evidence to provide insight into the current landscape of QPS competencies and frameworks. Additionally, this review sought to identify how competencies and competency frameworks have been designed, developed, implemented and evaluated.

methodsWe searched for studies on QPS competencies and frameworks in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library from Jan 2010 to April 2023. We also conducted grey literature searches on Google Scholar, Opengrey, and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). All studies that described QPS competencies and/or frameworks were included. Since the studies varied in type, a narrative approach was adopted to synthesize the included studies.

resultsOut of the initial 14 144 studies found, 118 were deemed relevant after thoroughly reviewing abstracts and full texts. Of these, 36 studies outlined specific QPS competency frameworks, while the remaining 82 studies assessed various QPS competencies across diverse contexts. Upon analysing data from all 118 studies, we identified 37 QPS topic areas and a variety of competency statements encompassing skills, knowledge, and behaviours deemed relevant for promoting QPS. The most frequent QPS topic areas included communication, patient safety culture, teamwork and collaboration, risk monitoring and management and patient-centred care.

conclusionThe review has highlighted key insights into education and training related to QPS competencies. Core competency topic areas have been identified that are essential for workforce development and the promotion of quality and patient safety in healthcare settings. However, there is a gap in research on strategies to effectively implement and integrate QPS frameworks into practice, leading to insufficient evidence on translating these competencies into real-world application.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHealth PersonnelPatient SafetyQuality of Health CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID42330363
PMCPMC13322961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.