ReviewAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2026
Airway mucus plugs in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pathobiology, imaging, and implications for clinical trials.
Review in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for mucus plug assessment: toward a new generation of airway imaging biomarkers.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mucus plugs have been previously recognized as an important pathological feature in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their clinical role in these diseases has not been explored in depth until recently. Mucus plug formation is driven by mucus hyperconcentration, changes in mucus viscoelastic properties, impaired clearance, and mucociliary collapse. Scoring systems, such as the bronchopulmonary segment mucus plug score, have been used to associate greater mucus plug burden with poor clinical outcomes. Additional scoring methods obtained through quantitative image processing are currently under development. Mucus plug burden has been associated with greater exacerbations and spirometric decline in both asthma and COPD, as well as greater mortality in COPD. Recently, mucus plug burden has been used as an endpoint in clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic therapies in asthma; multiple biologic therapies demonstrated decreases in mucus plug burden and associated improvements in spirometry with treatment. Together, these data suggest that mucus plugs may be a treatable trait in asthma and COPD. Mucus plug burden has current clinical, phenotypic, and predictive utility and shows promise as a future biomarker. Increased incorporation into clinical trials, expanded evidence of treatment effect, and standardization of methodology and imaging protocols will be needed. Computed tomographic detection of mucus plug burden is ready for greater incorporation into both research outcomes and clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.