ArticleJMIR nursing2026
Digital Leadership Scale for Clinical Nurses: Development and Validation of an Instrument.
Article in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapid advancement of digital technologies, combined with the evolving complexity of health care environments, has introduced a new paradigm in nursing practice. Clinical nurses are now required not only to deliver safe and effective patient care but also to demonstrate competencies in digital literacy and innovation. Among these emerging competencies, digital leadership has become a critical attribute-enabling nurses to lead digital transformation, ensure patient safety, enhance care quality, and support system-level change within health care organizations. Despite its increasing relevance, there is a notable absence of validated measurement tools tailored to assess digital leadership in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate a Digital Leadership Scale for Clinical Nurses (DLS-CN) to systematically evaluate the digital leadership capabilities of nurses working in clinical settings. Methods: The scale development process followed a rigorous multistep procedure. Initial items were derived from previous qualitative research involving a literature review and in-depth interviews, complemented by an additional literature review conducted in this study. The content validity of 38 preliminary items was evaluated by 9 experts over 2 rounds. A pilot test was conducted with 30 nurses, followed by cognitive interviews with 5 nurses to refine item clarity and relevance. The final set of items was administered to 446 clinical nurses across various health care institutions. Data were randomly split for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Additional analyses were conducted to evaluate item discrimination, convergent validity, and internal consistency using IBM SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 23.0. Results: The finalized DLS-CN consists of 29 items grouped under four domains: (1) ability to use digital technology, (2) digital safety management, (3) digital collaboration mindset, and (4) organizational influence. These 4 factors explained 56.9% of the total variance. The scale showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.95). Convergent validity was demonstrated through strong positive correlations with the Nursing Informatics Competency Scale (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.82; P<.001) and the Self-Leadership Scale (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.83; P<.001). Conclusions: The DLS-CN is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring digital leadership among clinical nurses. It offers a practical tool for educators, administrators, and researchers to assess and enhance digital leadership capabilities-ultimately supporting the digital transformation of health care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.