Observational studyJMIR mental health2026
Functional Outcome Prediction in Young Adults With Mental Health Symptoms Using Machine Learning and Large Language Models: Longitudinal Observational Study.
Observational study in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional impairments associated with mental health conditions are on the rise. Predicting functional outcomes may improve the targeting of preventive interventions. While prognostic models have primarily focused on psychosis, early recognition services require a transdiagnostic approach. Objective: This study aimed to predict global functioning within a 2-year follow-up using baseline clinical and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in a population-based sample of young, help-seeking individuals presenting with affective and anxiety symptoms as well as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Methods: We classified 357 help-seeking individuals aged 18-35 years recruited from 9 sites as "impaired" (Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF] ≤60; n=228) or "nonimpaired" (GAF>60; n=129) at year 1 and/or year 2 follow-up. GAF classification group status at follow-up was predicted using linear support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, and large language model (LLM) Llama-3 using clinical assessments and/or structural MRI. Leave-one-site-out (SVM) or external sample (LLM) was used for validation. Results: SVM achieved balanced accuracy of 69.2% using clinical features only. Items related to baseline occupational functioning, interpersonal relationships, cognitive functioning, psychotic and affective symptoms, as well as the presence of anxiety disorder, were most predictive. The decision tree further reduced the feature set to 5 predictive items, achieving balanced accuracy of 76.6%. Although amygdala and hippocampal subregions achieved balanced accuracy of 57.1%, structural MRI did not improve the overall prediction. Llama-3 performed comparably well to SVM (balanced accuracy of 72.6%). Conclusions: Machine learning demonstrated good performance in predicting global functioning. Interestingly, the out-of-the-box LLM performed comparably well without being trained or fine-tuned, highlighting the potential of leveraging free-text data for mental health prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.