ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2026
Anti-Mullerian Hormone As A Predictor Of Live Birth For Patients With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.
Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels were associated with live birth and miscarriage rates following the first euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle for patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (URPL).
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included all patients (n=63) at an academic medical center in New York undergoing their first euploid FET with a sole diagnosis of URPL between October 2019 and October 2023. URPL was defined as a history of two or more spontaneous abortions (SAB) after a pregnancy (defined as a positive home pregnancy test or serum hCG > 2mIU/mL) and before 20 weeks of gestation without a known cause. Patient demographic data was obtained, and the primary outcomes of live birth and miscarriage were assessed while controlling for relevant clinical variables (obesity, prior number of spontaneous abortions, and aneuploidy). Significance was set at p<0.05.
resultsLower AMH (<1 ng/mL) was associated with having fewer total blastocysts from prior IVF cycles (p=0.02). Patients with lower AMH also had fewer euploid blastocysts from prior IVF cycles, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.08). There were no significant differences based on AMH, and the overall miscarriage rate was 21.3%. Adjusting for obesity and prior number of SABs, AMH was not associated with live birth (aOR 1.12 (95% CI 0.93-1.35), p=0.23) or miscarriage (aOR 0.88 (95% CI 0.64-1.19), p=0.40).
conclusionsThese results suggest that once a euploid embryo is created, AMH is not associated with subsequent transfer outcomes among women with URPL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.