ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Social marginalisation, environmental degradation and Toxoplasma gondii exposure in urban informal settlements in Brazil.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii infection poses a substantial global health burden, yet transmission pathways and population susceptibility in urban informal settlements remain poorly characterised, particularly for women of childbearing age. We analysed archived samples from a cross-sectional serosurvey of 728 children and adolescents aged 4-18 years living in a marginalised urban community in Salvador, Brazil, to characterise exposure patterns and identify demographic, socioeconomic, behavioural, household, and environmental factors associated with seropositivity and to assess spatial heterogeneity in exposure risk. Overall seroprevalence was 49%, increasing with age and higher in males than females; Bayesian serocatalytic models estimated sex-specific forces of infection of 0.078 for males and 0.050 for females, with approximately half of female participants still susceptible upon reaching childbearing age, highlighting the risk of congenital toxoplasmosis. In regression analyses, seropositivity was associated with male sex, lower household income, cat ownership, and residence at lower elevation, greater distance from the main road, and reported contact with sewer water. Notably, most seropositive participants (77.3%) did not live in households with cats. Geostatistical modelling demonstrated fine-scale spatial heterogeneity, with clustered hotspots exceeding 50-60% predicted prevalence. Adjustment for measured covariates attenuated but did not eliminate spatial clustering, indicating residual fine-scale spatial structure consistent with unmeasured environmental processes operating beyond individual households, alongside additional unstructured variation that may reflect household-level or peridomestic differences not captured by the measured covariates. Together, these findings provide evidence consistent with an important role for household and peridomestic environmental exposure pathways in T. gondii transmission in informal settlements, extending beyond households with domestic cats and shaped by social marginalisation and environmental vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.