Trial reportPloS one2026
Effectiveness of CoronaVac in a pioneer risk-based allocation clinical trial during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04789356 (Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Inactivated Adsorbed Vaccine Against COVID-19 CoronaVac, Among Public Safety and Education Workers With Risk Factors for Severity, in Manaus), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Inactivated Adsorbed Vaccine Against COVID-19 CoronaVac, Among Public Safety and Education Workers With Risk Factors for Severity, in Manaus (Amazonas)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CoronaVac, an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, was one of the first deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the limited vaccine availability and the urgent need to assess effectiveness in target populations, a risk-based allocation clinical trial was designed to generate evidence under the ethical and logistical constraints at the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccination. In Manaus, Brazil, participants working in public service (education and public safety) aged 18-49 years were assessed regarding the risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Participants with one or more comorbidities, who were considered at higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes if infected, were allocated to early vaccination, while participants without comorbidities were enrolled as an unvaccinated comparison group. Blood samples were collected before each vaccine dose (D0 and D28) and during in-person follow-up visits (D90 and D180). Additional information was obtained through phone calls. Clinical cases of COVID-19, hospitalizations, deaths, and antibody titrations were the evaluated endpoints, considered after the second week following the second dose of the vaccine. A total of 6,226 participants were included: 1,139 in the low-risk group, and 5,087 in the high-risk vaccinated group. COVID-19 incidence was statistically significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the vaccinated group at D28 (5.2% vs. 40.9%) and D90 (10.3% vs 31.6%). Hospitalization and death rates were low, with no difference observed between the groups. There was a decline in highly reactive titers at D180 in the vaccinated group. This pioneer risk-based allocation clinical trial provided evidence that CoronaVac reduced the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes among individuals with comorbidities, effectively aligning their risk with that of lower-risk, unvaccinated individuals. Beyond its clinical implications, the study underscores the importance of adaptive, real-world research designs in rapidly generating actionable evidence in response to emerging public health threats. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT04789356.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.