ArticlePloS one2026
Testing for pre- and post-copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inbreeding depression poses a significant threat to fitness in many taxonomic groups. Studies have suggested that females may mate with multiple males to reduce inbreeding through post-copulatory discrimination against closely related males. Stored product pests are a group where inbreeding risk may arise frequently as small numbers colonies patchily distributed resources. We examined potential pre- and post-copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneous using direct observation of breeding behaviour and subsequent scoring of offspring parentage using phenotypical markers. Contrary to expectations, males courted and mated with related females slightly more frequently than with unrelated females. Offspring of unrelated parents were more likely to survive to adulthood, meaning that males unrelated to their mate had a higher number of adult offspring when competing for fertilisations with a male who was a full sibling to the female. When the lower survival of inbred offspring was accounted for, there was no difference in the estimated fertilisation success of males in relation to whether or not they were related to their mate. The second male to mate initially gained the majority of fertilisations, but this declined so that by week five, first and second males had similar fertilisation success. This suggests that sperm precedence in this species includes some effects of both sperm displacement and stratification of sperm within the spermatheca. We discuss our observation of a preference for mating with siblings combined with evidence for inbreeding depression in the context of potential inclusive fitness benefits of kin mating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.