ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Acceptability of Self-Help Plus and Problem Management Plus interventions among clients and implementation insights from staff of Opioid Agonist Treatment programs in Ukraine.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-Help Plus (SH+) and Problem Management Plus (PM+) are two scalable psychological interventions developed by the World Health Organization to reduce stress, improve emotional regulation, and strengthen coping skills among adults experiencing adversity. SH+ is a low‑intensity, group‑based stress‑management course, while PM+ is a brief, individual intervention focused on problem‑solving and behavioural activation. This study explores the acceptability of SH+ and PM+, among staff providing psychosocial support and clients of the opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programs in Ukraine during wartime. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 12 clients, alongside an analysis of meeting notes from monthly staff management discussions. Data were collected from April to October 2023 (during the second year of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine) at OAT centers in Lviv, Sumy, and Vinnytsia. The SH+ group format created a supportive atmosphere, which contributed to the outcomes despite initial challenges with client engagement. Participants noted that even passive attendance in program sessions was associated with positive impacts, reflecting the intervention's suitability for clients who struggle with active participation. The key advantage of PM+ was its flexibility in scheduling, which was beneficial given many clients' unpredictable and chaotic life situations. The personalized nature of PM+ facilitated open dialogue and a deeper exploration of clients' needs. Clients responded positively to the individual format of PM+, finding it familiar and comfortable. They appreciated the opportunity to be heard in a relaxed and confidential setting. Overall, the study indicates that SH+ and PM+ are acceptable, feasible, and valued by both clients and staff, supporting their potential integration into routine OAT services to help address unmet mental health needs during wartime.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.