Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329884›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Assessment of the implementation of SDG 4 goal by EU countries in the light of the 2030 Agenda using a hybrid approach in linear ordering.

Marek Walesiak, Grażyna Dehnel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marek WalesiakDepartment of Econometrics and Computer Science, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0922-2323
Grażyna DehnelDepartment of Statistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0072-9681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of the following study was to rank EU countries on their progress in achieving SDG 4 "Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all" in 2023 and to determine their distance from the target values set for 2030. Eurostat monitors and evaluates progress towards SDG 4 using six indicators. Based on these indicators, an aggregate measure was constructed according to the assumptions of a hybrid approach combining multidimensional scaling with linear ordering. The proposed method involves a non-compensatory approach and target-based data adjustment, which prevents high values of some indicators from offsetting shortfalls in others, thereby providing a more reliable assessment of progress towards policy targets. The results show that Nordic countries, along with the Netherlands and Estonia, rank highest, while Romania, Bulgaria, Cyprus and Greece remain the furthest from the 2030 targets. It is worth noting that no EU country has yet reached the aggregate SDG 4 target level, which highlights a substantial implementation gap at the EU level. The hybrid approach additionally makes it possible to visualise the multidimensional phenomenon in a two-dimensional space, enhancing interpretability of cross-country differences.

Indexed as

GoalsEuropean UnionHumans

Identifiers

PMID42329884
PMCPMC13286218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.