ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring motor variability in adults with severe athetoid or ataxic cerebral palsy: Impact on error-based and reward-based learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) are characterized by elevated movement variability. Movement variability has been proposed as a mechanism that facilitates the exploration of diverse movement strategies. However, in the case of CP, this variability is often excessive, potentially impeding effective error correction and motor learning processes. This study aims to investigate motor variability in adults with severe athetoid and ataxic CP profiles, focusing on its impact on error-based and reward-based learning mechanisms. The study included 13 adults with severe CP and a control group of 18 adults without disabilities. The findings revealed that individuals with CP exhibit significantly greater motor variability than the control group, which correlates with higher absolute error rates and a diminished capacity for task-related adjustments. These results suggest that CP negatively affects motor stability and precision, complicating motor learning. Furthermore, it was observed that error-based tasks are more accessible for individuals with CP, as they showed substantial performance improvements following training, in contrast to the reward-based tasks. This study underscores the importance of personalized motor learning interventions for individuals with CP, considering the variability among CP subtypes and the individual characteristics of each person. The research provides essential insights into motor learning adaptation and retention in individuals with severe CP, highlighting the necessity of continuous practice to sustain long-term improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.