Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329787›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2026

Comparison of deep learning approaches for extreme low-SNR image restoration.

Nasreen Elizabeth Buhn, Sriya Reddy Adunur, Joseph Hamilton, Summer Levis, Guy M Hagen, Jonathan D Ventura

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nasreen Elizabeth BuhnBiological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0401, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-5558-9245
Sriya Reddy AdunurDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0354, USA.
Joseph HamiltonUCCS BioFrontiers Center, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, 1420 Austin Bluffs Parkway, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.
Summer LevisUCCS BioFrontiers Center, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, 1420 Austin Bluffs Parkway, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.
Guy M HagenUCCS BioFrontiers Center, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, 1420 Austin Bluffs Parkway, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-9481
Jonathan D VenturaDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0354, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-8529

Funding

Imaging Live Cells with Super-Resolution MicroscopyR15GM128166 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI HAGEN, GUY, SPENDIER, KATHRIN · 2018 to 2023
$945k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM128166NIH HHS 2R15GM128166-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLive-cell fluorescence microscopy enables the study of dynamic cellular processes. However, fluorescence microscopy can damage cells and disrupt these dynamic processes through photobleaching and phototoxicity. Reducing a sample's light exposure mitigates the effects of photobleaching and phototoxicity but results in low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) images. Deep learning provides a solution for restoring these low-SNR images. However, these deep learning methods require large, representative datasets for training, testing, and benchmarking, as well as substantial GPU memory, particularly for denoising large images.

resultsWe present a new fluorescence microscopy dataset designed to expand the range of imaging conditions and specimens currently available for evaluating denoising methods. The dataset contains 17,568 paired high/low-SNR images across 15 sub-datasets that vary in specimen, imaging modality, objective, staining type, excitation wavelength, and exposure time. We evaluated five state-of-the-art deep learning denoising models on the dataset, including supervised, unsupervised, and zero-shot techniques. We also developed an image stitching method that enables large images to be processed in smaller crops and reconstructed.

conclusionsOur dataset provides a diverse benchmark for evaluating deep learning denoising methods, and our stitching method provides a solution to GPU memory constraints encountered when processing large images. Among the evaluated deep learning models, the supervised Transformer-based model had the best denoising performance but required the longest training time.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansMicroscopy, Fluorescencedeep learningdenoisingfluorescence microscopyimage restorationimage stitchingphototoxicity

Identifiers

PMID42329787
PMCPMC13366542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.