ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026
Flight Performance and Flight in Wind in Three Phylogenetically Distinct Miniature Insects.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small size imposes constraints on flight due to a reduction in aerodynamic efficiency of small wings. Consequently, miniature insects are often considered to be poor flyers that disperse by drifting in winds. Only few studies have actually measured the active flight of very small insects. The few that did, report surprisingly high flight speeds compared to the size of such small creatures. To test both the limits to flight performance and response to wind, we tracked free-flight within a wind tunnel in a whitefly, a thrips, and a bark beetle. The studied species represent small insects from three different orders (Hemiptera, Thysanoptera and Coleoptera) that underwent independent miniaturization in the course of evolution. Flights were tracked with and without wind and the wind was either horizontal or vertical. From the 3D flight trajectories of the insects, we extracted aerial velocity and manoeuvring performance. The insects did not passively drift downwind and two of the three insects studied displayed distinct upwind flight behaviors. Maximal flight speed was slower than that of larger insects, but faster in terms of body length per second. The manoeuvrability of two out of the three studied species exceeded that of larger animals in terms of flight speed for a minimal turning radius. These findings advocate the inclusion of active flight in small insect dispersal models and suggest that miniaturization may result in improved aerial manoeuvrability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.