Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329682›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Neural signatures of model-based and model-free reinforcement learning across prefrontal cortex and striatum.

Bruno Miranda, James L Butler, W M Nishantha Malalasekera, Timothy E J Behrens, Peter Dayan, Steven W Kennerley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Meta-learning is expressed through altered prefrontal cortical dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruno Miranda *Institute of Neurology, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4660-6051
James L Butler *Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5017-6472
W M Nishantha MalalasekeraInstitute of Neurology, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Timothy E J BehrensWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, FMRIB, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-1177
Peter DayanMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-1839
Steven W KennerleyInstitute of Neurology, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-7507

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W003392/1Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/51711/2011Gatsby Charitable Foundation GAT3955Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa Premio Joao Lobo Antunes 2017Wellcome Trust 10.35802/096689Wellcome Trust 10.35802/214314Wellcome Trust 10.35802/219525Wellcome Trust 10.35802/220296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals integrate knowledge about how the state of the environment evolves to choose actions that maximise reward. Such goal-directed behaviour - or model-based (MB) reinforcement learning (RL) - can flexibly adapt choice to changes, being thus distinct from simpler habitual - or model-free (MF) RL - strategies. Previous inactivation and neuroimaging work implicates prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the caudate striatal region in MB-RL; however, details are scarce about its implementation at the single-neuron level. Here, we recorded from two PFC regions - the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC), and two striatal regions, caudate and putamen - while two rhesus macaques performed a sequential decision-making (two-step) task in which MB-RL involves knowledge about the statistics of reward and state transitions. All four regions, but particularly the ACC, encoded the rewards received and tracked the probabilistic state transitions that occurred. However, ACC (and to a lesser extent caudate) encoded the key variables of the task - namely the interaction between reward, transition, and choice - which underlies MB decision-making. ACC and caudate neurons also encoded MB-derived estimates of choice values. Moreover, caudate value estimates of the choice options flipped when a rare transition occurred, demonstrating value update based on structural knowledge of the task. The striatal regions were unique (relative to PFC) in encoding the current and previous rewards with opposing polarities, reminiscent of dopaminergic neurons, and indicative of an MF prediction error. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of selective and temporally dissociable neural mechanisms underlying goal-directed behaviour.

Indexed as

Corpus StriatumNeuronsPrefrontal CortexReinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsDecision MakingMacaca mulattaMaleReinforcement Machine LearningRewardanterior cingulate cortexcaudate nucleusdecision-makingneurosciencereinforcement learningrhesus macaquevalue encoding

Identifiers

PMID42329682
PMCPMC13286570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.