Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329660›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Macro Monte Carlo dose calculation for very high energy electron (VHEE) radiotherapy.

Chengchen Zhu, Florian Amstutz, Claire M Costantini, Werner Volken, Marco F M Stampanoni, Peter Manser, Michael K Fix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chengchen ZhuDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Florian AmstutzDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Claire M CostantiniDepartment of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Werner VolkenDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco F M StampanoniInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich and PSI, Villigen, Switzerland.
Peter ManserDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael K FixDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

Siemens Healthineers CompanySwiss Cancer Research Foundation KFS-5948-08-2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVery high energy electron (VHEE) radiotherapy has gained growing interest owing to its potential to reach deep-seated targets and induce FLASH effect. Dose calculations can be performed using analytical or Monte Carlo (MC) methods. Analytical approaches enable rapid dose computation but suffer from limited accuracy in heterogeneous media, whereas MC methods provide high accuracy at the expense of substantial computational cost. Macro Monte Carlo (MMC) is a local-to-global method designed to improve dose calculation efficiency compared to general-purpose MC methods. In MMC, particle transport is based on precalculated transport data generated with general-purpose MC simulations on specific geometries, which is subsequently used to model particle transport over macroscopic steps within the absorber, avoiding computationally expensive microscopic tracking. MMC made it to a standard electron dose calculation engine in a commercial treatment planning system. However, to date, MMC has not been investigated for electron energies above 25 MeV. PURPOSE: To develop and validate an MMC framework for VHEE radiotherapy that improves dose calculation efficiency while preserving accuracy compared to general-purpose MC methods for electron energies up to 250 MeV.

methodsLocal simulations were performed using EGSnrc with monoenergetic electron pencil beams incident perpendicularly on spherical geometries (0.2-25 MeV) with radii of 0.5-3 mm, and slab geometries (25-250 MeV) of 2 mm thickness, composed of various materials. Physical quantities including energy loss, lateral displacement, and angular distributions of primary and secondary particles were scored and stored in a database. This database was subsequently used to transport electrons step-by-step in the global simulations, employing slab-based transport at energies ≥25 MeV and switching to spherical geometries for electron energies <25 MeV to account for increased scattering. Energy deposition was scored in a 3D dose grid. MMC dose calculations were validated against EGSnrc for monoenergetic VHEE beams (50-250 MeV) incident on homogeneous and heterogeneous slab phantoms, using pencil beams, parallel spot beams with 1 mm radius, and parallel beams with a field size of 5 × 5 cm

resultsIntegrated depth dose curves and lateral dose profiles agreed within 2% of the maximum dose for all cases considered. For homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms, MMC dose distributions yielded gamma passing rates above 97% (2%/1 mm) and 99% (2%/2 mm), respectively, compared to EGSnrc. For patient CT datasets, gamma passing rates exceeded 94% (2%/1 mm) and 97% (2%/2 mm). Overall, MMC achieved up to a 27-fold improvement in dose calculation efficiency compared to EGSnrc.

conclusionsAn MMC framework for VHEE dose calculation was successfully developed and validated for electron energies up to 250 MeV. The method demonstrated good agreement with EGSnrc while providing up to an order-of-magnitude improvement in dose calculation efficiency for the studied cases.

Indexed as

ElectronsMonte Carlo MethodRadiation DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy Dosagedose calculationMacro Monte Carloradiotherapyvery high energy electron (VHEE)

Identifiers

PMID42329660
PMCPMC13285896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.