Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329654›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Hybrid Hospital at Home and Physical Activity for Adults Admitted to the Hospital With Acute Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Maria Normand Larsen, Tatjana Sandreva Dreisig, Maja Kjær Rasmussen, Charlotte Demuth von Sydow, Thyge Lynghøj Nielsen, Maria Lund Christensen, Miljena Copois, Casper Roed, Theis Lange, Thea Kølsen Fischer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05920304 (Early Discharge - a Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating Mental and Physical Effects on Acutely and Chronically Ill Patients in a Telemedicine Supported Virtual Hospital at Home Model), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05920304 nacompletednot on this map

Early Discharge - a Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating Mental and Physical Effects on Acutely and Chronically Ill Patients in a Telemedicine Supported Virtual Hospital at Home Model

TypeinterventionalSponsorNordsjaellands HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled111ConditionsEpidemic Disease, InfectionsArmsvirtual Hospital at Home (vHaH)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria Normand LarsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region, Denmark.
Tatjana Sandreva DreisigDepartment of Clinical Research, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region, Denmark.
Maja Kjær RasmussenCentre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Charlotte Demuth von SydowDepartment of Clinical Research, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region, Denmark.
Thyge Lynghøj NielsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region, Denmark.
Maria Lund ChristensenDepartment of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region, Denmark.
Miljena CopoisDepartment of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region, Denmark.
Casper RoedDepartment of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region, Denmark.
Theis LangeDepartment of Public Health, Section of Global Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thea Kølsen FischerDepartment of Clinical Research, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Capital Region, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hospital-at-home (HaH) models may alleviate bed capacity constraints and reduce hospital-associated risks. Evidence on patient physical activity and patient experience in hybrid HaH for adults with acute conditions remains limited. Objective: To estimate whether a hybrid HaH model increases early physical activity and patient satisfaction without compromising safety or clinical outcomes compared with standard brick-and-mortar (BAM) care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, investigator-initiated nonblinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at 2 internal medical wards at a regional public hospital providing acute and emergency care in Denmark. Enrollment was from June 1, 2023, to January 31, 2025; follow-up continued to May 20, 2025. Adults (aged ≥18 years) admitted for acute illness were screened for eligibility. Key exclusions included unstable clinical condition, major physical or cognitive impairment, limited Danish proficiency, and pregnancy. Interventions: The hybrid HaH program (Influenzer) included remote patient monitoring via a patient-facing app and clinical dashboard with oversight 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; weekday virtual ward rounds; and home-based clinical tasks. BAM patients received standard inpatient care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were physical activity during the first 24 hours after randomization and patient-reported satisfaction and perceived safety shortly after discharge. Secondary outcomes included mortality (7, 30, and 90 days), readmissions (30 and 90 days), and adverse events of special interest during admission. Results: Of 230 participants assessed for eligibility, 111 were randomized. The HaH model included 58 participants (median age, 64 [IQR, 50-75] years; 30 males [52%]); BAM included 53 participants (median age, 65 [IQR, 57-73] years; 28 males [53%]). HaH participants were significantly more physically active than BAM participants (adjusted mean difference, 1763 steps [95% CI, 153 to 3373 steps]; P = .03). Satisfaction was higher in HaH vs BAM (mean [SD] score, 4.41 [0.79] vs 4.10 [0.81]; mean difference, 0.31 [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.65]; P = .04), while perceived safety was similarly high across groups (mean [SD] score, HaH: 4.37 [0.88] vs BAM 4.23 [0.83]; mean difference, 0.14 [95% CI, -0.22 to 0.50]; P = .24). No significant differences were observed in any of the recorded safety events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of adults receiving medical care for acute conditions at home, hybrid HaH was associated with greater early physical activity and patient satisfaction, with no signal of excess harm compared with BAM care. Future multicenter studies should incorporate frailty measures and assess durability and linkage to clinical end points. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05920304.

Indexed as

ExerciseHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHospitalizationAcute DiseaseAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRemote Patient Monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42329654
PMCPMC13288738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.