ArticleOncology and therapy2026
Real-World Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries Treated with Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment-Naïve CLL.
Article in Oncology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is a dearth of head-to-head studies comparing covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (cBTK) inhibitors in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Real-world evidence may complement clinical trial data by assessing relative effectiveness in routine practice. This retrospective observational study used a de-identified Medicare Fee-For-Service database to compare real-world outcomes associated with first-line cBTKi monotherapies in older adults with CLL.
methodsPatients aged ≥ 65 years with CLL initiating first-line ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, or zanubrutinib monotherapy between January 1, 2020 and September 30, 2025 were included. Real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD), time to next treatment (rwTTNT), and overall survival (rwOS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses were performed by age group.
resultsAmong 10,523 patients included, 3006 (28.6%) received zanubrutinib (median follow-up 15.8 months), 4309 (40.9%) received acalabrutinib (20.7 months), and 3208 (30.5%) received ibrutinib (34.9 months). Median rwTTD was not reached (NR) for zanubrutinib, compared with 24 months for acalabrutinib and 14 months for ibrutinib. Median rwTTNT was NR for zanubrutinib, 40 months for acalabrutinib, and 20 months for ibrutinib. After adjustments for age, sex, race, CCI, and year of index, zanubrutinib had significantly longer rwTTD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57 [95% CI 0.51-0.61]), rwTTNT (HR 0.63 [0.55-0.71]), and rwOS (HR 0.64 [0.54-0.77]) compared to ibrutinib. Zanubrutinib also had significantly improved rwTTD (HR 0.86 [0.78-0.94]), rwTTNT (HR 0.87 [0.78-0.96]), and rwOS (HR 0.77 [0.66-0.88]) compared to acalabrutinib. Similar patterns were observed when stratified by age group over 65.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that zanubrutinib is associated with improved real-world outcomes compared with other cBTK inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.