Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329583›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of implant dentistry2026

Development of a preoperative accuracy prediction model using machine learning for implant placement in static-guided surgery: retrospective observational study.

Takuya Mino, Yurina Matsuoka, Ken'ichi Morooka, Kana Tokumoto, Hiroaki Shimizu, Yoko Kurosaki, Aya Kimura-Ono, Hiromitsu Kishimoto, Takuo Kuboki, Kenji Maekawa

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of implant dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Takuya MinoDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics and Occlusion, School of Dentistry, Osaka Dental University, 1-5-17 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0008, Japan. mino-t@cc.osaka-dent.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8770-6836
Yurina MatsuokaDepartment of Semiconductor, Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan.
Ken'ichi MorookaDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan.
Kana TokumotoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawacho, Nishinomiya, 663-8501, Japan.
Hiroaki ShimizuShimizu Dental Clinic, 7-1-9 Kamisawa-dori, Hyogo-ku, Kobe, 652- 0046, Japan.
Yoko KurosakiDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics and Occlusion, School of Dentistry, Osaka Dental University, 1-5-17 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0008, Japan.
Aya Kimura-OnoCenter for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5- 1 Shikata-cho, Okayama, 700-8525, Japan.
Hiromitsu KishimotoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawacho, Nishinomiya, 663-8501, Japan.
Takuo KubokiDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama, 700-8525, Japan.
Kenji MaekawaDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics and Occlusion, School of Dentistry, Osaka Dental University, 1-5-17 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0008, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K19982Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K03141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to develop a machine learning model capable of preoperatively predicting three-dimensional implant placement errors at the implant apex in static-guided surgery and to identify the clinical features associated with placement accuracy.

methodsClinical data partially derived from a previous observational study were analyzed. In total, 181 patients and 480 implants placed using fully static-guided surgery were included in this study. The outcome variable was defined as three-dimensional implant placement error at the implant apex relative to the preoperative simulation, dichotomized as less than 0.5 mm or ≥ 0.5 mm. Twenty-one clinical and radiographic factors previously suggested to influence the placement accuracy were used as explanatory variables. The feature importance was evaluated using three gradient boosting decision tree models. Furthermore, a stacking model combining multiple classifiers was constructed, and the classification performance was assessed using ten-fold cross-validation.

resultsThe feature importance analysis identified 12 features associated with implant placement errors. The stacking model demonstrated superior classification performance compared to individual classifiers. The true positive rate was 0.73, false negative rate was 0.27, false positive rate was 0.14, and true negative rate was 0.86.

conclusionsThe proposed stacking model correctly classified 86% of cases with implant placement error less than 0.5 mm and 73% of cases with implant placement error of ≥ 0.5 mm. These findings suggest that the proposed model may support the preoperative evaluation of implant placement accuracy in static-guided surgeries.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousMachine LearningSurgery, Computer-AssistedClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesAccuracyDecision treesImplant placementMachine learningPrediction algorithmsSensitivity and specificitySupport vector machineSurgical guide

Identifiers

PMID42329583
PMCPMC13538333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.