ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Four-dimensional flow MRI for identifying high-risk esophageal varices: a comparison and combination with spleen volume and splenic extracellular volume fraction.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of four-dimensional flow MRI alone and in combination with spleen volume and splenic extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for identifying high-risk esophageal variceal (HRV) in patients with liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 58 cirrhosis patients who underwent four-dimensional flow MRI and endoscopy were prospectively recruited and were divided into HRV group (n = 25) and non-HRV (NHRV) group (n = 33). The hemodynamic parameters of the portal vein (PV), superior mesenteric vein (SMV), and splenic vein (SV) derived from four-dimensional flow MRI for identifying HRV were analyzed and compared with spleen volume and splenic ECV. Then a combined model for identifying HRV was constructed by using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis with stepwise forward.
resultsThe peak velocity and maximum pressure gradient of the PV, SMV, and SV, as well as the total volume of the SMV, were significantly greater in the HRV group than in the NHRV group. The SV peak velocity had the highest AUROC for identifying HRV and was comparable to the spleen volume and splenic ECV. The combined model incorporating these three indicators showed superior performance with an AUC of 0.945, outperforming individual imaging indicators and other laboratory-based models.
conclusionFour-dimensional flow MRI is a valuable noninvasive technique for detecting HRV in cirrhosis patients. The combined model incorporating SV peak velocity, spleen volume, and splenic ECV provided an accurate prediction of HRV, which may help avoid unnecessary screening endoscopy. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The combined model incorporating spleen vein peak velocity derived by 4D flow MRI, spleen volume, and spleen ECV performed better than individual imaging indicators and laboratory-based models, which may help to avoid unnecessary screening endoscopy and aid in clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS: Noninvasive assessment of the risk of HRV in cirrhosis remains crucial but inadequate. Four-dimensional flow MRI can effectively identify HRV in patients with cirrhosis. Combining SV peak velocity, splenic volume, and ECV effectively identifies HRV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.