ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2026
Cost-effectiveness thresholds for initiating osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women in China: a microsimulation analysis based on real-world data.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study estimated FRAX PURPOSE: To determine drug-specific FRAX
methodsA validated Markov microsimulation model was used to simulate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of no treatment versus alendronate, zoledronate, denosumab, and teriparatide treatment. Baseline patient characteristics and risk factor distribution were sampled from the largest national osteoporosis survey in mainland China. The analysis was conducted from the societal perspective, applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 13,000 per QALY gained (equivalent to one times China's GDP per capita).
resultsDenosumab was cost-effective at a 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability of 7% and zoledronate at 12%; neither alendronate nor teriparatide became cost-effective. For denosumab, the cost-effective threshold of 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability increased with age from 51 to 65 years and then declined in older women, ranging from 5 to 12%. For zoledronate treatment, the cost-effective thresholds of a 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability were 8% at 51-55 years, 12% at 71-75 years, and 8.5% at 76-80 years.
conclusionsFor Chinese postmenopausal women, denosumab was the most cost-effective treatment, while zoledronate also reached favorable thresholds in selected age groups. Implementing drug-specific FRAX®-guided thresholds may optimize treatment decisions for osteoporosis and support efficient healthcare resource use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42329508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.