ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Machine-learning-based quantitative body condition scoring in Qinchuan beef cattle using conventional body measurements.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body condition score (BCS) is a cornerstone indicator for beef cattle reproduction and nutritional management, but conventional visual scoring is subjective and lacks quantitative standards. This study aimed to develop a low-cost, objective BCS evaluation system for Qinchuan beef cattle using routine body measurements and machine-learning models. A total of 321 qinchuan breeding cows aged 24-36 months were scored for BCS (4-8) by two trained evaluators following the Chinese national standard, and seven conventional traits (withers height, body length, hip height, heart girth, abdominal girth, rump width, and body weight) were recorded. One-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation analyses were used to test the biological consistency of subjective scores and to identify informative traits. Six composite body condition indices were constructed to standardize frame size, and seven machine-learning algorithms were compared under nested cross-validation using quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) as the primary metric. All measured traits increased significantly across BCS classes, and heart girth, abdominal girth, and body weight showed the strongest correlations with BCS ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). A composite morphometric index (CMI) provided the best trade-off between correlation and classification performance. The best model, k-nearest neighbors using six key traits, achieved a QWK of 0.89 and 95.5% prediction accuracy within ±1 BCS unit. This study demonstrates that conventional body measurements, combined with composite indices and machine-learning models, can provide a practical, scalable tool for objective BCS evaluation in Qinchuan beef cattle and support precision livestock farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42329494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.