ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Clinical implications of discordance in HER2 reassessment from HercepTest to 4B5 in metastatic breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHER2-low breast cancer has emerged as a therapeutic category following the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, where trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) improved survival. As the Ventana 4B5 assay was the companion diagnostic in this trial, many patients previously tested with the Dako HercepTest required reassessment. However, the frequency and clinical predictors of discrepancies between these assays remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate discordance frequency between HercepTest
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent prior HER2 testing with HercepTest and subsequent reassessment with 4B5 between May 2023 and November 2024 at our institution. The primary endpoint was reassessment discordance, and secondary analyses examined the clinicopathological predictors of discordance.
resultsEighty-four patients (median age: 58 years) were included. Specimens were obtained from primary tumors (28.6%) and metastatic lesions (71.4%); 15.5% were resections and 84.5% were biopsies. The discordance rate between HercepTest
conclusionsDiscordance between HercepTest
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.