Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329394›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2026

Magnetic resonance imaging in children with and without sedation: current practice, experience and future perspectives of a UK paediatric hospital.

Clare M Simcock, Enrico De Vita

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clare M SimcockRadiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, WC1N 3JH, London, United Kingdom. clare.simcock@gosh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-7927
Enrico De VitaDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics, Developmental Neurosciences, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom. enrico.devita@gosh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-1288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children are not just small adults. This is particularly true when designing optimal MRI examination approaches for paediatric patients ranging from neonates to tall 17-year-olds. We highlight many of the latest technological advances that are starting to make a difference in paediatric MRI, as well as some newer technologies from research that can be extremely useful in clinical practice when imaging children and babies. Delivering high-quality paediatric MRI requires not only technical expertise and appropriate selection of timings, MRI sequences, age-specific motion-restraining pads, motion-tracking methods, coils and audio-visual devices. It also requires a holistic, person-centred approach that recognises the unique needs, anxieties and vulnerabilities of child-patients, as well as their families or carers. Effective preparation, appropriate environmental design and play-based support all have a pivotal role in enabling more children to undergo MRI without the need for sedation or general anaesthesia. This not only reduces clinical risks and service pressures but also enhances the child's experience and long-term engagement with healthcare. Sedation and general anaesthesia remain essential tools for selected patients, but their use should be guided by robust risk/benefit assessment, informed consent and adherence to national guidelines.

Indexed as

ChildrenFeed and wrapGeneral anaesthesiaMagnetic resonance imaging - MRIPaediatricSedation

Identifiers

PMID42329394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.