ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Guideline development for MRD diagnostics in AML as a blueprint for solid tumors].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) has evolved over the past two decades from predominantly prognostic supplementary information to a central tool for risk stratification, treatment planning, and study endpoint definition. This development has been closely linked to advances in diagnostic technologies (multiparameter flow cytometry, qPCR/dPCR, next-generation sequencing) and international standardization initiatives.
aimsThis review aims to assess the evolution of MRD recommendations for AML over the past decade, identify key developmental milestones, and evaluate their relevance for cfDNA/ctDNA-based MRD approaches in solid tumors. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis is a narrative review article. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The 2018 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the first time established a widely accepted framework for minimum technical standards and reporting for measurable disease monitoring in AML. The 2021 update further integrated these technical recommendations into clinical decision-making and established consistent definitions, including those for MRD response and MRD relapse. The 2025 update of the ELN-DAVID network represents a comprehensive revision, as MRD recommendations are now systematically formulated along the lines of the genetic ELN 2022 risk groups and AML subtypes. In parallel, ultrahigh-sensitivity, error-corrected NGS approaches (UHS-NGS) have opened up new applications for MRD. For pathological diagnostics, AML can be seen as a model disease, since the standards established over many years for pre-analytics, analytical validation, cut-offs, longitudinal interpretation, quality assurance, and interdisciplinary implementation represent a blueprint for current cfDNA/ctDNA-based MRD strategies in solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42329370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.