ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2026
A Framework for Standardising Toxicity Management Guidelines in Oncology Clinical Trials.
Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For new investigational medicinal products (IMPs) entering clinical development, toxicity management guidelines (TMGs) can be developed as an addition to the clinical study protocol. These guidelines inform best clinical practice for the treatment of potential product-related toxicities including dose modifications and symptom management recommendations. TMGs ensure that early identification and intervention strategies are in place, helping to minimise risks and improve patient outcomes. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly evolving drug class within oncology, and their accelerated development should be accompanied by high quality TMGs to support clinical trial success. Having a pre-prepared, 'off-the-shelf' set of TMGs for ADCs ensures consistency of care across several clinical trials investigating this drug class. The authors present a framework for developing these standardised TMGs across AstraZeneca's ADC portfolio. It incorporates information gathering from internal documents and published labels or guidelines, cross-product comparison, and standardisation decisions based on biological rationale and study/patient context. Although patient- and context-specific modifications remain necessary, a semi-standardised framework prioritises safety while allowing clinical judgment. Considerations for specific circumstances when the TMGs could be deviated from and how the approach can be extended to additional modalities and therapy areas are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.