Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329306›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Canopy structure, dry matter intake and performance of Holstein × Gyr cows (Bos taurus taurus L. × Bos taurus indicus L.) under rotational stocking in Urochloa spp. pastures.

Natalia Avila Soares, Carlos Augusto de Miranda Gomide, Patrícia do Rosário Rodrigues, Domingos Sávio Campos Paciullo, Mirton José Frota Morenz, Angelo Herbet Moreira Arcanjo, Fernando Antônio de Souza, Fernanda de Kássia Gomes, Pedro Drummond Rodrigues, Ângela Maria Quintão Lana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natalia Avila SoaresDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1952-3632
Carlos Augusto de Miranda GomideBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Dairy), Av. Eugênio do Nascimento, 610, Juiz de Fora, 36038-330, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0537-7021
Patrícia do Rosário RodriguesDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1806-4534
Domingos Sávio Campos PaciulloBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Dairy), Av. Eugênio do Nascimento, 610, Juiz de Fora, 36038-330, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-328X
Mirton José Frota MorenzBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Dairy), Av. Eugênio do Nascimento, 610, Juiz de Fora, 36038-330, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-4744
Angelo Herbet Moreira ArcanjoMinas Gerais Agricultural Research Corporation (EPAMIG Oeste), Getúlio Vargas Experimental Station, Rua Afonso Rato, Uberaba, 1301, 38060-040, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4892-6534
Fernando Antônio de SouzaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-2131
Fernanda de Kássia GomesMinas Gerais Agricultural Research Corporation (EPAMIG Centro Oeste), Santa Rita Experimental Station, MG-424 Highway, km 64, Prudente de Morais, 35738-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-9410
Pedro Drummond RodriguesDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil. pedrodrummond.vet@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0005-4674
Ângela Maria Quintão LanaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0066-6198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pasture-based dairy systems require well-adapted forage cultivars and appropriate grazing management to sustain milk production while maintaining favorable sward structure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of Holstein × Gyr crossbred cows and the productive and structural characteristics of Paiaguás grass pasture (Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Paiaguás) and Ipyporã grass pasture (Urochloa brizantha × Urochloa ruziziensis cv. BRS Ipyporã), under rotational stocking during two rainy season. For the agronomic variables, a completely randomized design was adopted in a split-plot design: two grasses and three experimental phases, with twelve paddocks evaluated per phase. The arrangement for milk yield and milk composition was the complete switchback trial, and for dry matter intake, it was the cross-over. Paiaguás grass showed greater herbage mass, accumulation and herbage accumulation rate. Ipyporã grass showed a greater leaf: stem ratio (1.54 vs. 1.02) and greater volumetric density (127.45 vs. 108.15 kg DM cm ha

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal HusbandryDairyingMilkPoaceaeAnimalsCattleFemaleLactationDry matter intakeHerbage productionLeaf:stem ratioMilk compositionMilk yieldVolumetric density

Identifiers

PMID42329306
PMCPMC13287148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.