ArticleActa diabetologica2026
Glycemic control and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate the association of HbA1c level at the time of atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis with adverse outcomes (death, ischemic stroke (IS), myocardial infarction (MI), bleeding) in an unselected nationwide cohort of patients with AF and diabetes mellitus (DM).
methodsThe retrospective FinACAF registry study covered all patients with incident AF in Finland between 2010 and 2017. Outcomes were analyzed using HRs and sHRs (hazard ratios and subdistribution hazard ratios), with HbA1c modelled both categorically and continuously.
resultsAmong 157 658 patients with incident AF, DM was present in 23% (n = 35 872). Baseline HbA1c was available in 49% (17 519) of DM patients. DM was associated with increased hazards of all evaluated outcomes. Elevated HbA1c in categorical analyses was associated with progressively increased adjusted HRs and sHRs, with highest ratios seen in HbA1c > 63 mmol/mol for death (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.45-1.68), IS (sHR 1.38 95% CI 1.20-1.59), and MI (sHR 1.70 95% CI 1.48-1.94), when compared to patients without DM. In continuous analyses, higher HbA1c levels were associated with increasing hazards for mortality, IS, and MI. Bleeding hazards remained stable across the HbA1c spectrum.
conclusionsHigher baseline HbA1c levels were associated with progressively increased hazards of mortality, IS, and MI in patients with incident AF and DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.