Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42329268›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2026

Predicting persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty using different machine learning algorithms.

Anni Rajamäki, Aleksi Reito, Mari Karsikas, Mika Niemeläinen, Antti Eskelinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anni RajamäkiCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. anni.rajamaki@tuni.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-8046-2747
Aleksi ReitoCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-6461
Mari KarsikasCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Mika NiemeläinenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-111X
Antti EskelinenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0302-0253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAfter total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10-20% of patients remain unsatisfied. Well-performing clinical prediction models can provide individualized risk estimates and stratification in terms of poor outcomes, resulting in unnecessary surgeries being avoided and patients being counseled preoperatively. We aimed to create a precise, well-performing prediction model for clinical application using different machine learning algorithms to predict those patients who will have residual pain, a low total Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the patient group who do not achieve minimally clinical important difference (MCID) in OKS 1 year after TKA.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study based on patients who had undergone primary TKA at our institution combined with 751 patient-related variables. The multivariable models used were based on the results of univariate analysis. We used the machine learning method Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The discrimination capability of the models was measured with the area under the curve (AUC).

results11,755 patients were included in this study. There were 850 (7.2%) patients who experienced persistent pain 1 year after TKA. The AUC was 0.67. For the secondary outcomes, the AUC values were similar. The most important variables in the model were lower preoperative OKS, younger age, valgus malalignment, lower preoperative pain OKS, use of mild opioid, neuropathic pain medicine and thyroxine, and higher body mass index.

conclusionThe prediction models achieved poor AUCs. It seems clear that the prediction of pain and functional outcome after TKA is difficult, even with a large patient cohort combined with 751 patient-related variables and sophisticated machine-learning algorithms.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeMachine LearningPostoperative PainAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42329268
PMCPMC13285364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.