ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026
Dermatologists' Attitudes toward Ultrasound-guided One-step Excision for Cutaneous Melanoma: A Survey of Clinical Practice and Perceived Barriers.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wide local excision of primary cutaneous melanoma is usually performed in 2 stages: diagnostic excision followed by definitive surgery with margins based on histopathological Breslow thickness. High-frequency ultrasound may enable reasonably accurate preoperative thickness estimation and may allow a single-stage approach. However, its adoption in routine practice remains limited. This study evaluated dermatologists' acceptance of ultrasound-guided 1-step melanoma surgery and explored barriers to its implementation. An electronic survey including 9 clinical vignettes with dermoscopy images and preoperative ultrasound measurements was sent to dermatologists in the Loire Valley, France. Participants selected preferred management strategies, rated ultrasound utility and patient preference on Likert scales, and provided open-ended responses about perceived obstacles. Fifty-three dermatologists completed the questionnaire (57% response rate). One-step surgery was selected in 28% of scenarios, in creasing to 47% when diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy and decreasing to 24.5% without histopathological confirmation (p<0.0001). Most respondents acknowledged ultrasound's usefulness for thickness estimation (median Likert score 3 [IQR 3-4]) and believed patients would prefer a single procedure (median 4 [IQR 3-5]). Major barriers included limited access to high-resolution ultrasound (n=18), concerns regarding overtreatment (n=14) and medico-legal risk in the absence of histopathological confirmation (n=9). Dermatologists remain cautious about 1-step melanoma surgery, primarily due to diagnostic uncertainty and resource limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.