ArticleAge and ageing2026
Implementation of the Ironbark falls prevention program: a mixed methods process evaluation with Aboriginal communities.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Standing strong and tall-improving mobility and balance in older Aboriginal people through the Ironbark program.Age and ageing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFalls are a leading cause of injury and loss of independence among older Aboriginal people. The Ironbark program is a culturally co-designed, community-based fall prevention initiative, incorporating exercises and Yarning circles, a culturally grounded form of group discussion. This paper presents a process evaluation of the program, examining fidelity and key factors influencing implementation across settings.
methodsSixteen sites across two Australian states implemented the Ironbark Standing Strong and Tall program. Process data were collected from 15 sites through structured session observations and semi-structured interviews with exercise facilitators. Fidelity and dose were assessed quantitatively, with adherence scored using a summative checklist score. Qualitative data were thematically analysed and mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
resultsThe program was delivered with high fidelity to 117 participants with median adherence scores consistently above 80%. Sessions were implemented as planned, with strong participant engagement in both exercise and Yarning components. Key facilitators included Aboriginal leadership, trusted site managers, program flexibility and supportive service structures. Challenges included managing varying physical abilities, maintaining engagement over time and external disruptions (e.g. Coronavirus -19 pandemic, weather). Content repetition was noted as a barrier to sustained attendance by participants in later stages. Facilitators recommended additional training, mid-program assessments and access to site-collected data. Sustainability was linked to workforce capacity and securing ongoing funding, particularly to support Aboriginal staff and transport.
conclusionThis process evaluation indicated that a culturally-relevant fall prevention program for older Aboriginal people can be implemented with fidelity across community settings. Findings provide practical guidance for exercise facilitators and on sustaining and expanding the Ironbark program and inform broader efforts to embed culturally safe, community-led health programs in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.