ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Exploring the genetic landscape of ciprofloxacin-induced DNA supercompaction in Escherichia coli.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA-damaging antibiotics like ciprofloxacin (CIP) induce extensive double-strand breaks in Escherichia coli, triggering both the SOS response and rapid DNA supercompaction. To uncover genes involved in the latter process beyond the previously identified key orchestrators encoded by recN and recA, we developed a novel machine learning-assisted high-throughput screening workflow and applied it to nearly 4000 E. coli strains, including the Keio collection's single-gene deletion strains and additional in-house strains. Conservative validation identified 15 hit strains with impaired DNA supercompaction. While defects in recombinational repair genes were associated with the most severe impairments, our investigation also revealed genes not previously associated with DNA compaction or repair that had milder and more heterogeneous effects on supercompaction, including yaiW, which encodes a membrane-associated protein. Notably, several non-DNA-repair gene deletions affected RecN colocalization with the nucleoid, recN expression, SOS response activity, or survival after CIP exposure, supporting indirect or modulatory roles. Altogether, this work confirms RecN and RecA as primary drivers of DNA supercompaction and demonstrates that high-content imaging combined with machine learning-assisted analysis provides a scalable approach to explore bacterial DNA organization phenotypes and DNA damage responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.