Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42328788›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

SpliceSelectNet: a hierarchical Transformer-based deep learning model for splice site prediction.

Yuna Miyachi, Kenta Nakai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuna MiyachiDepartment of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8656 Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-4684-9656
Kenta NakaiDepartment of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8656 Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8721-8883

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJSP21080University of Tokyo
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate RNA splicing is essential for gene expression and protein function, yet the mechanisms governing splice site recognition remain incompletely understood. Aberrant splicing caused by mutations can lead to severe diseases, including cancer and genetic disorders, underscoring the need for accurate computational tools to predict splice sites and detect disruptions. Existing methods have made significant advances in splice site prediction but are often limited in handling long-range dependencies due to high computational costs, a factor critical to splicing regulation. Moreover, many models lack interpretability, hindering efforts to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms. Here, we present SpliceSelectNet (SSNet), a hierarchical Transformer-based deep learning model that predicts splice sites from DNA sequences spanning up to 100 kb. By integrating local and global attention mechanisms, SSNet efficiently captures both proximal and distal regulatory signals while maintaining single-nucleotide resolution. Across multiple benchmark datasets, SSNet achieves state-of-the-art performance in splice site prediction and aberrant splicing detection. Systematic in silico mutagenesis demonstrates that attention scores reflect functional sequence importance, supporting their biological relevance. Long-range sequence perturbation experiments further show that SSNet captures distal regulatory effects beyond conventional receptive fields. Together, these results establish SSNet as a biologically interpretable framework for modeling long-range splicing regulation from genomic sequence.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningRNA Splice SitesRNA SplicingSoftwareHumansRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID42328788
PMCPMC13284721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.