Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42328779›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2026

Magnetic Control of Intravascular Collaborative Robotic (Cobot) Guidewire: Neurovascular Intervention Studies in Phantom and Swine Models.

Dong-In Kim, Beomjoo Kim, Hakjoon Lee, Junsun Hwang, Sungwoong Jeon, Jin-Young Kim, Sung Won Youn, Hongsoo Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dong-In KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Beomjoo KimDepartment of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hakjoon LeeDepartment of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Junsun HwangInstitute of Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale De Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sungwoong JeonIMsystem Co. Ltd., University-Industry Cooperation Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Young KimIMsystem Co. Ltd., University-Industry Cooperation Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Sung Won YounDepartment of Radiology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hongsoo ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3613-2833

Funding

Ministry of Health & Welfare RS-2025-25459885National Research Foundation 2021M3F7A1082275University of Massachusetts Amherst
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strokes such as acute ischemic stroke require vascular access for endovascular thrombectomy. To navigate the small and complex cerebral vessels with multiple branches, clinicians use guidewires or catheters with pre-shaped tips. However, complex procedures still face the problem of increased X-ray exposure for both clinicians and patients. Engineering technologies such as robotic guidewires and catheters are being applied to neurovascular procedures to make them faster and more effective. The technology presented in this study involves Collaborative Robotic (Cobot) guidewires that can be steered by magnetic fields to effectively enter the target vessel and navigate complex blood vessels. The Cobot guidewire can be steered according to the direction of the magnetic field because its tip contains a permanent magnet and a magnetic polymer. The magnetic field for steering the Cobot guidewire can be controlled and generated by electromagnetic control systems (ECS). In this study, the performance of neurovascular procedures using the Cobot guidewire and manual guidewire is compared in both phantom and swine models. Based on various parameters, the Cobot guidewire demonstrates superior performance in neurovascular procedures compared to the manual guidewire. Favorable procedure time and navigation efficiency suggest that a magnetically assisted Cobot guidewire is potentially feasible for neurovascular interventions.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnimalsEquipment DesignPhantoms, ImagingSwinebrain vascular accidentendovascular procedureinterventional radiologymagnetic actuationrobotic surgical proceduressoft robotics

Identifiers

PMID42328779
PMCPMC13410658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.