ArticlePeerJ2026
ERO1A as a novel biomarker for risk stratification and immunotherapeutic guidance in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A considerable proportion of patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (esLUAD) experience recurrence after curative resection, highlighting the need for improved biomarkers. Current biomarkers such as PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden (TMB) have limited predictive utility in early-stage disease. Through an unbiased screening approach, endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductase 1α (ERO1A) was identified as a candidate gene for further investigation. Methods: Multi-omics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were integrated. Machine learning algorithms (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM)) were employed to identify core prognostic genes. Functional enrichment, immune microenvironment analysis, and drug sensitivity prediction were conducted. Key findings were validated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in an independent institutional cohort. Results: ERO1A was identified as a robust, independent predictor of poor overall and recurrence-free survival in esLUAD. It was significantly upregulated in tumors and associated with enhanced proliferative pathways. Paradoxically, high ERO1A expression correlated with an immune-activated tumor microenvironment, characterized by enriched CD8 + T cell infiltration, reduced M2 macrophages, and increased mature tertiary lymphoid structures. ERO1A-high tumors exhibited elevated TMB and PD-L1 levels, and were associated with superior response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in validation cohorts. Bioinformatic analysis suggested that ERO1A-high tumors might exhibit resistance to conventional chemotherapy while showing potential sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapies, though this was not confirmed in clinical validation. Conclusions: ERO1A expression stratifies lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) into distinct subsets with divergent therapeutic implications. It represents a promising biomarker for prognostic stratification and immunotherapy selection, supporting its potential clinical utility in guiding peri-operative therapy decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.