ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Human leukocyte antigen pharmacogenetics in infectious diseases: anti-infective drug toxicity and host immune response.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms are central to anti-infective pharmacogenetics and to inter-individual variability in infection outcomes and vaccine responses, but clinical relevance depends on whether an association changes treatment or prevention decisions. This narrative review is organized around two complementary pillars: first, severe, typically T cell-mediated adverse drug reactions to anti-infective agents, where HLA can support prevention when genetic effect, phenotype precision, and therapeutic alternatives converge; and second, selected, replicated HLA-region associations with infection outcomes or vaccine immunogenicity, where biological effects may be robust yet individual-level clinical translation is often limited. Within the adverse drug reaction pillar, the clearest preventive paradigm remains HLA-B*57:01-guided abacavir prescribing, with additional high-signal examples including dapsone hypersensitivity and flucloxacillin-induced liver injury that illustrate how large effect sizes do not always justify routine screening. Within the infection and vaccine pillar, HIV, HCV, and hepatitis B vaccine response provide the strongest evidence that HLA shapes clinically relevant host-response heterogeneity. Across both domains, the key pharmacological distinction is between mechanistically persuasive associations and those that are sufficiently robust, transportable, and decision-relevant to change practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.