Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42328606›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Pullulan-dextran composite beads as bone fillers: from material design and industrial production to clinical application in oral surgery.

Sylvain Catros, Laurent Bidault, Sandrine Auget, Charlotte Pasquet, Camille Ehret, Rachida Aid, Mathilde Fenelon, Jean-Christophe Fricain, Joelle Amedee-Vilamitjana, Didier Letourneur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sylvain CatrosUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, BioTis, Bordeaux, France.
Laurent BidaultSiltiss, SA, Zac de la Nau, Saint-Viance, France.
Sandrine AugetSiltiss, SA, Zac de la Nau, Saint-Viance, France.
Charlotte PasquetSiltiss, SA, Zac de la Nau, Saint-Viance, France.
Camille EhretSiltiss, SA, Zac de la Nau, Saint-Viance, France.
Rachida AidUniversité Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM 1148, LVTS, X Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.
Mathilde FenelonUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, BioTis, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Christophe FricainUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, BioTis, Bordeaux, France.
Joelle Amedee-VilamitjanaUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, BioTis, Bordeaux, France.
Didier LetourneurUniversité Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM 1148, LVTS, X Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing biomaterials from natural polysaccharides for medical applications presents significant challenges in terms of biocompatibility, scalability, and regulatory compliance. We report here the full development and preclinical validation of 250-300 µm pullulan-dextran-hydroxyapatite microbeads for bone regeneration, intended for use in sinus lift procedures. This class III medical device was fabricated using two pharmaceutical-grade, biodegradable, and biocompatible polysaccharides (pullulan and dextran) that were crosslinked without the use of organic solvents and embedded with hydroxyapatite microparticles. Industrial-scale production of 59 batches achieved batch-to-batch reproducibility, comprehensive physicochemical characterizations, stability, sterilization, and packaging in syringes under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Preclinical validation included

Indexed as

bone tissue engineeringclinical translationdextranGMPhydroxyapatitemicrobeadspullulan

Identifiers

PMID42328606
PMCPMC13276405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.