ArticleJournal of cognition2026
Orthographic Neighbourhood Size Effects in Chinese Character Recognition: Small, Inconsistent, and Theoretically Ambiguous.
Article in Journal of cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing orthographic neighbourhood size measures for Chinese words rely on the representation of words or characters as consisting of two components, which leads to coarse measurements. Recently, Wang and Keuleers (2024) proposed the use of Ideographic Description Sequences (IDSs) which encode the basic stroke patterns of characters and their spatial relationships to create more precise neighbourhood measures. In two studies, we compared the effect of different neighbourhood size measures on recognition of single Chinese characters, while controlling for character frequency and number of strokes. In Study 1, we replicated the conventional two-unit approach using neighbourhood size measures for semantic (N-sc) and phonetic (N-pc) components. We found no effect of N-pc or N-sc. In Study 2, we used IDS-based measures to represent orthographic similarity at a more detailed level. In Study 2a, we found that the effect of a neighbourhood size measure based on single-component substitution (N-ch) was inhibitory but weak. In Study 2b, we found that a neighbourhood density measure using weighted edit distance (WLD-10) showed facilitation. In Study 2c, we found that this facilitatory effect was retained with a normalised measure (WND-10). While conceptually the IDS-based measures are better neighbourhood measures and one might hope that this would also imply stronger neighbourhood effects, our results show that the effects of neighbourhood size on character recognition remained small and difficult to interpret theoretically. Our results suggest that if any meaningful effects of orthographic neighbourhood size exist for character recognition in Chinese, they are probably small and inconsistent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.