Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2026
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus serratus anterior plane block for analgesia and respiratory function in patients with multiple rib fractures: a large-sample, single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This large-sample, randomized, double-blind controlled trial directly compared the analgesic efficacy and impact on respiratory function of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in patients with unilateral multiple rib fractures. Methods: A total of 158 eligible patients were randomized to receive either ESPB ( Results: The ESPB group demonstrated a significantly lower 24-h pain AUC compared to the SAPB group (mean difference -17.78, 95% CI: -21.00 to -14.56, Conclusion: For patients with unilateral multiple rib fractures, ESPB provides significantly better early comprehensive analgesia and reduces opioid requirements compared to SAPB, without compromising safety. ESPB may be considered as a preferred first-line regional analgesic technique, especially for patients with a lower fracture burden. Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), Registration No. ChiCTR2300067544.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.