ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Hereditary angioedema attack trends among patients maintained on lanadelumab long-term prophylaxis.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Longitudinal studies using real-world data are needed to assess the effectiveness of long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for hereditary angioedema (HAE) during successive years of treatment. Objective: This United States-based retrospective analysis assessed the longitudinal effectiveness of lanadelumab LTP on attack rate reduction year on year in lanadelumab-treated patients with HAE. Methods: Data were from the Consortium of Independent Immunology Clinic's HAE Patient Registry, a dataset managed by Trio Health. Patients who were treated with lanadelumab between August 2018 and December 2023 and who remained on treatment for at least 6 months were included. Data were collected during routine clinic visits, with the time between clinic visits defined as "follow-up intervals" for outcome assessment. Given data were ascertained from real-world clinical practices, visits did not occur at uniform fixed intervals. Patients were followed for up to 4 visits after lanadelumab initiation. Results: The analysis included 141 patients with HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction. The mean ± SD duration on lanadelumab was over 3.5 years (1305 days ± 567). Mean length of follow-up intervals 1 to 4 were 376, 267, 286, and 283 days, respectively. Lanadelumab discontinuation rates were low (range 1.3%-3.1%) across the 4 intervals. The mean ± SD monthly attack rates ranged from 0.21 ± 0.43 (interval 1) to 0.16 ± 0.38 (interval 4) ( Conclusions: Patients on lanadelumab for at least 6 months had low discontinuation rates. Attack rates were low, and the proportion of attack-free patients increased across intervals, indicating attack-free status was achievable in the later years on treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.