ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2026
Impact of lean six sigma methodology on healthcare quality in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Saudi Arabia, where healthcare modernization is a key priority under Vision 2030, Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is being increasingly adopted to address healthcare challenges. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of LSS methodology on healthcare quality. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Specific databases were searched (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and the Saudi Digital Library) for studies published between January 2016 and December 2023. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed English-language studies assessing LSS interventions in Saudi healthcare settings, with measurable outcomes related to quality improvement. Studies focusing solely on Lean or Six Sigma, outside the healthcare sector, or lacking empirical data were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality and risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diverse Research (QuADS) tool. Data were synthesized qualitatively. This review included 13 studies from diverse Saudi healthcare settings. The methodological quality of included studies was generally high, exceeding the 70% quality threshold. LSS interventions consistently improved operational efficiency (e.g., reduced wait times and streamlined workflows), patient safety (e.g., fewer medication errors and hospital-acquired infections), medication management (e.g., reduced prescription errors), and resource utilization (e.g., cost savings and resource allocation). However, limited workforce expertise, resistance to change, and insufficient organizational support are the challenges to LSS implementation. LSS positively impacts healthcare quality in Saudi Arabia. Targeted training and robust support structures are essential for sustaining LSS-driven improvements as a valuable tool for healthcare transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.