Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42328329›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2026

The Arrow and the Atlas-A Narrow Escape in the Cervical Spine: A Case Report About Penetrating Injury With an Arrow Impacted in the Neck.

Sameer Lamichhane, Santosh Khadka, Aayush Aryal, Sushil Paudel, Dinesh Kafle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sameer LamichhaneDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery IOM, TUTH Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0401-2339
Santosh KhadkaDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery IOM, TUTH Kathmandu Nepal.
Aayush AryalDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery IOM, TUTH Kathmandu Nepal.
Sushil PaudelDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery IOM, TUTH Kathmandu Nepal.
Dinesh KafleDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery IOM, TUTH Kathmandu Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penetrating neck injuries (PNI) are a rare presentation of all trauma cases. A rational strategy and prompt patient assessment are necessary for management. Selective treatment has replaced mandatory exploration in the treatment of penetrating neck trauma. A 41-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency department with an arrow penetrating the neck, without signs of neurological deficit. He had an arrow impacted into the right posterolateral aspect of his neck just posterior to the sternocleidomastoid muscle, corresponding to the axial level of the C1-C2 vertebra. The arrow was dislodged after extending the entry wound and removed with a gentle maneuver in the operating room with an uneventful postoperative period and follow-ups. Although PNIs are rare, a thorough understanding of the anatomy in this area is essential. Direct withdrawal in a controlled setting may be an excellent option for penetrating cervical and posterior neck injuries by a foreign body that is away from the neurovascular and aerodigestive tracts and in a hemodynamically stable patient.

Indexed as

arrowdirect extractionexplorationneurovascularpenetrating neck injury

Identifiers

PMID42328329
PMCPMC13280558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.