ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
How different defensive formations affect physical match demands in the German Handball-Bundesliga: a comparison of the attacking and defending team.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In handball, the effects of different defense playing formations are little studied yet, but play a crucial role for managing training volume and intensity when planning specific drills. The aim of the study was to examine how different playing formations within a positional defense phase influence physical match demands for both the attacking and defending team. Method: A fixed installed local positioning system (Kinexon LPS) was used to collect positional data during the 2023/2024 German Handball-Bundesliga season. The physical match demands were operationalized by the normalized number of accelerations and decelerations (events per 10 min) and the average distance covered (m) by the team within a positional defense phase. The playing formations within a positional defense (6:0, 5:1, 4:2, 3:3) were detected using an existing algorithm that was modified accordingly. In total, 11,863 positional defense phases in equal numbers of players (6 vs. 6) were analyzed including 316 players of 18 clubs. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were fitted to estimate differences between the playing formations for the attacking and defending team. Results: Significant three-way interaction effects were observed for deceleration events in defending teams in the 5:1 (0.235 Conclusion: We adapted an algorithm to detect positional defense phases (6:0, 5:1, 4:2, and 3:3). With more aggressive playing formations, total distance and numbers of acceleration and deceleration events tended to increase in both the attacking and defending teams. A stronger increase in deceleration events was estimated for defenders in the 3:3 formation, however this finding should be interpreted cautiously due to the low frequency of this formation. Our outcomes may help practitioners manage training intensity and volume when planning specific drills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.