Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42328285›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Range of Normalized Glandular Dose for Mammography Using Patient-Specific Glandular Fractions.

Lacey L Medlock, Murtuza S Taq, Bryce Smith, Joyoni Dey

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lacey L MedlockDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Medical Physics Program, Louisiana State University, LA.
Murtuza S TaqDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Medical Physics Program, Louisiana State University, LA.
Bryce SmithMary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Joyoni DeyDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Medical Physics Program, Louisiana State University, LA.

Funding

Breast Cancer Detection and Imaging using Analyzer-less X-ray InterferometryR21EB029026 · NIBIB · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI DEY, JOYONI · 2020 to 2022
$525k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB029026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, and mammography remains the primary modality for early detection. Because mammography uses ionizing radiation, accurate estimation of normalized glandular dose (DgN) is important for risk assessment. Recent breast dosimetry models, including TG-282, incorporate population-based glandular tissue distributions; however, patient-specific glandular distributions remain unknown from conventional mammographic projections. In previous work (Smith, Dey et al., 2025), glandular fraction (GF) maps were estimated from a single mammographic projection. While these maps determine glandular path length along each projection ray, they do not uniquely define glandular tissue depth. In this work, we propose a framework for estimating a patient-specific range of DgN from a projection-derived GF map. Using simulated data, glandular tissue was distributed to the top, center, and bottom of the breast volume using Siddon ray-tracing. These configurations preserved the GF map while producing maximum, intermediate, and minimum DgN values. Monte Carlo simulations were performed, and DgN was normalized to entrance air kerma. DgN varied by up to a factor of three solely due to differences in glandular tissue depth, despite identical GF maps and visually indistinguishable projection images. Using randomized realizations derived from TG-282 glandular distributions for Cranio-Caudal (CC) and Medio-Lateral Oblique (MLO) views, dose ratios were calculated relative to central glandular placement. Central placement overestimated DgN by less than 5 and 15 percent on average for MLO and CC distributions respectively, whereas centroid-based placement underestimated dose by up to 25 percent. These results indicate that patient-specific bounds on DgN can be estimated from limited mammographic information and that central placement provides a conservative dose estimate.

Identifiers

PMID42328285
PMCPMC13278343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.